Priority for new Trainer / Upvote System
Hi,
first of all wanted the thank you (the Plitch Team) for your continued hard work.
Since there is no suggestion forum i simply post it here. Feel free to remove/move the thread if that is not the correct place for it.
As soon as a game is in the Status of "Trainer in Progress" you can no longer upvote that game because it no longer is in the requested status.
I bring that one up because since around 1 month now the trainer for "Breachway" is in the status of "in progress" with only 2 upvotes. I don't know how your priority works on which basis you choose to implement new trainers for games that did not get any so far, but i suspect it has to do with the upvote system.
If that is the case, my sugesstion is that even if the trainer is marked as "in progress" let us continue to upvote those in order to show how much requests/desire a game actually has.
And since there is no gamethread for games that did not receive a trainer yet, you cannot even make a thread asking on a status or something.
Keep up the great work 😁
Hi,
first of all wanted the thank you (the Plitch Team) for your continued hard work.
Since there is no suggestion forum i simply post it here. Feel free to remove/move the thread if that is not the correct place for it.
As soon as a game is in the Status of "Trainer in Progress" you can no longer upvote that game because it no longer is in the requested status.
I bring that one up because since around 1 month now the trainer for "Breachway" is in the status of "in progress" with only 2 upvotes. I don't know how your priority works on which basis you choose to implement new trainers for games that did not get any so far, but i suspect it has to do with the upvote system.
If that is the case, my sugesstion is that even if the trainer is marked as "in progress" let us continue to upvote those in order to show how much requests/desire a game actually has.
And since there is no gamethread for games that did not receive a trainer yet, you cannot even make a thread asking on a status or something.
Keep up the great work 😁
Thank you for your feedback! We have decided that you can no longer vote for games that are already marked as “In Progress”. The reason for this is that a trainer maker has already been assigned to this game. New games for which we want to create a trainer are also assigned to a trainer maker. In these situations, it may also happen that the games have no or only a few votes. As soon as a game is assigned to a trainer maker, the trainer maker will definitely look at the game. How long it takes to implement a game after a trainer has been assigned always depends on the situation, and we can't make any general statements about how long a particular implementation will take. In any case, the game will definitely be looked at, regardless of how many votes it would get afterwards. Therefore, we have decided that you can no longer vote for a game once it has been assigned to a trainer maker, so that no votes are wasted.
Thank you for your feedback! We have decided that you can no longer vote for games that are already marked as “In Progress”. The reason for this is that a trainer maker has already been assigned to this game. New games for which we want to create a trainer are also assigned to a trainer maker. In these situations, it may also happen that the games have no or only a few votes. As soon as a game is assigned to a trainer maker, the trainer maker will definitely look at the game. How long it takes to implement a game after a trainer has been assigned always depends on the situation, and we can't make any general statements about how long a particular implementation will take. In any case, the game will definitely be looked at, regardless of how many votes it would get afterwards. Therefore, we have decided that you can no longer vote for a game once it has been assigned to a trainer maker, so that no votes are wasted.
Thanks for clarifying that :D
I assumed that in progress games is just a pile of games that were approved and your developers pick a game of from that pile (as i thought based on upvotes).
In the past as soon as a game was in progress it rarely took more than 2weeks for a trainer to be published in a basic state and maybe within the thread you asked the community which other functions we would like to see.
In the case of "Breachway" it took longer than usual and because i could not contribute upvotes to push it i created this thread (in the wrong assumption that those upvotes contribute to the priority).
As said keep up the great work
Thanks for clarifying that :D
I assumed that in progress games is just a pile of games that were approved and your developers pick a game of from that pile (as i thought based on upvotes).
In the past as soon as a game was in progress it rarely took more than 2weeks for a trainer to be published in a basic state and maybe within the thread you asked the community which other functions we would like to see.
In the case of "Breachway" it took longer than usual and because i could not contribute upvotes to push it i created this thread (in the wrong assumption that those upvotes contribute to the priority).
As said keep up the great work
Ah, okay, we understand. Yes, we can definitely understand why you wanted to find out more about this. In fact, it is the ‘Requested’ pile from which we choose the games with the highest number of votes. We are happy that we could help you with the situation! Thanks again for your kind words! :)
Happy gaming! ^^
Ah, okay, we understand. Yes, we can definitely understand why you wanted to find out more about this. In fact, it is the ‘Requested’ pile from which we choose the games with the highest number of votes. We are happy that we could help you with the situation! Thanks again for your kind words! :)
Happy gaming! ^^